Reader
The Riches of Gods Love · William Twisse

The Riches of Gods Love, Errata 2 – Title page 3

Addenda & Corrigenda.

PAg 1. lin. 24 read parts. p. 2. l. 30 r. rectifie ib: l. 56 r. were of. p. 4 l: 33 r. diverſions from. l 54 dele. not. p. 7 l. 36 is intended p 9 l. 35 foreign. p. 10 l. 16 twofold. p. 11 l. 10 and not. p. 15 l. 4 wholy God's, becauſe they are wholy from God. p. 16 l. 30 firſt ſhewing. l. 50 this objection. l. ult creatures love. p. 17 l. 43 world healthfull l. 47 he decreed ſhould periſh. p. 24 l. 3 judicious author. l. 4 converſion. l. 17 affect. p. 27 l 49 kind of a meritorious. p 29 l. 21 Vines. l 32 they are the ſons of God. l. 45 praiſed me. l. 54 we diſcourſe. p. 30 l. 23 of men. l. 50 to the dead. ib according to men. p. 32 l. 10 del. not. l. 19 very philoſophically takes. l. 56 to ſome p. 34 l. 28 over man his. l. 59 that it is. p. 35 l. 8. from ten l. 53 puniri. p. 36 l. 33 unſeſonable. l. 36 refuted. p. 37 l. 48 unto them. p. 39 l. 4 friend of his l. 45 at the font. p. 40 l. 16. dele if. l. 18 expoſition. l. 24 Judas may ceaſe, and the prupoſe of electing Judas may &c: l. 35 and in ſaying. p. 41 l. 40 of being l. 45 in this. p. 43. l. 20 leſſe evident, that death was not deſireable. l. 51 defignes. l. 54 at a being in a ſtate, l. 56 deliberative deſire. l 60 eſſe nolis. p. 45 l. 48 all ſoules. p. 53 they are. p. 46 l. 2 paine corrupting their. p. 47 l. 2 praeoptat. l. 23 foreign p. 48 l. 5, 6 degree l. 8 degree of diminution. l 10 any paine. p. 49. l. 18 my argument. p. 50. l. 7 in this l. 22 will. p. 51. l. 22 the corrupt. p 53. l. 33. permittente Deo. p 55 l. 1: But God by this opinion doth will and procure it by a powerfull and effectuall decree, which cannot be reſiſted p. 56 l. 5 this will. l 53 ſignes of p. 57 l 8 God: p. 59 l. 9 of Thomas. p. 60 l 16 as holily. p. 61 l. 45 is juſt. p. 62. l. 4 reſtraines. ib l. 14 good works. l. 22 that therefore God. l. 28. double evill. l. 48 for it by. p. 63 l. 5 Potan. p. 64 l. 7 efficacy of. l 16 ſuppoſition. l. 18 neceſſarily but either neceſſarily or &c. l. 19 ſuppoſition. l. 24 of Aquinas. l. 26 on Gods. Marg: pro culpa. p. 65. l. 34 quotation. l. 45 to feare. l. 48. emortui ſarmenti quia Chriſto reſecti ſunt; l. 49 multi. p. 66 l. 7 ſaith not l. 12 nill that. l. 25 futurition. l. 47 from ſin. l. 56 or whither he abſtaine from that which is evill, he doeth not abſtaine from it in a gracious manner; p. 67 l. 12 this of. l. 24 you hearts. l. 51. mans infidelity. p. 68 l. 57. manner of appointing hereunto, for if they be at all appointed hereunto, undoubtedly they are preciſely appointed thereunto. p. 69 l. 12 ſuppoſition. p. 70 l. 28 ſecond way. p. 73 l. 24 as we. l. 44 ſeverally. p. 74 l. 46 author of the Sin. l. 48 del. good. p. 76. l. 13 will not. p. 78. l. 3 futurition. l. 29 procure. l. 30 as a ſecond. p: 80 l. 12 of England. l. 22 but we l. 31 againſt. l. 38 if he ſhould worke them contrary to their natures then &c. p. 81 l. 7 effecting. p. 83 l. 29 of ſin. p. 84 l. 24 acts. p. 85 l. 1 any naturall act. l. 50 mere pleaſure as the apoſtle profeſſeth that God hath mercy on whom he will; it is evident that God of his mere pleaſure &c. p. 86 l. 18 as uncapable. p. 89. l. 59 nec recte. p: 93 l. 30 will doe p. 94 l. 2 nill it. p. 97 l. 36 the cauſe l. 54. my anſwer. p. 100 l. 44 with their. p, 102 l. 56 and that p. 104 l. 4 Credible. p 105 l 2 agent. p. 118 l. 41 or vitious. p. 121 l. 41 will of. p. 127 l. 14 of deſtiny. p. 134 l. 44 aſſer…oribus. l. 47 quin author l. 50 I propoſe. p. 140 l. 21 ſo as to come to paſſe. p 146 l. 22 pillar had not. l. 23 del. pillar had. p. 147 l ult. why God p. 151 l. 38 & ſo. p. 157 l. 7 without which. p. 164 l. 56 it may. p. 186 l. 47 decrees. p. 193 l. 2 wherein 'tis manifeſt that finall perſeverance in ſin goeth before. l. 3 But if you farther proceed to make it good according to your uſuall courſe thus; finall perſeverance in ſin goeth before damnation. Ergo &c p: 195 l. 35 mine. l. 54 decrees. p. 198 l. 36 is in. p. 199 l 10 and ſome. l. 11. privatively.

A VINDICATION OF Dr. TWISSE FROM THE EXCEPTIONS OF Mr JOHN GOODWIN IN HIS Redemption Redeemed.

BY HENRY IEANES, Miniſter of Gods Word in Chedzoy.

OXFORD, Printed for T. Robinſon. 1653.

TO THE Reverend and Learned Mr IOHN GOODWIN.

SIR,

I Have aſſumed ſo much boldneſſe, as to examine ſome paſſages that you have in your Booke (entituled Redemption Redeemed) againſt D. Twiſſe: wherein I believe that you your ſelfe will acknowledg, that I have carried my ſelfe as a fair adverſary, as an adverſary only unto your opinions, and not unto your perſon, which I love & honour, as in other reſpects ſo for the good and great gifts and parts God hath beſtowed on you. Many of my friends have earneſtly diſſwaded me from this vindicatiō aſſuring me that I muſt expect from you inſteed of a reply, nothing but a libell. But for my part, I ſhall hope and pray unto the Almighty for better things of you. However I am not hereby deterred from entring into the liſts with you. However I am not hereby deterred from entring into the liſts with you, neither ſhall I deprecate your utmoſt ſeverity in rationall argumentation, for the diſcovery of any thing, that you conceive to be weake and unſound in this my diſcourſe. You may perhaps think and ſay that ſo ſmall a trifle is unworthy a diverſion from your more ſerious employments; but for that, I am contented that the learned Reader judge betwixt us. Indeed I had long ere this finiſhed an anſwer unto your whole Book; but that there was a generall, and (as I think) a juſt expectation, that ſome in the Univerſity of Cambridge, who diſſented from you, would comply with your faire invitation of them, to declare themſelves in ſome worthy and ſatisfactory anſwer to the particulars propounded in your Book: But upon their long ſilence (which I can neither excuſe, nor will I accuſe (as being altogether ignorant of the cauſes thereof) I renewed my thoughts of ſetting about this worke, and intended in the interim, to have annexed to this piece of D. Twiſſe, a Table referring unto ſuch paſſages in this, and other of his Books, as doe in great part ſatisfy whatſoever you have delivered, in your forementioned Treatiſe, in oppoſition unto the abſoluteneſſe of Divine Reprobation: But from theſe reſolutions I was quite taken off, by certain information, that the Learned M. Kendall (heretofore Fellow of Exeter Colledge in the Univerſity of Oxford) hath undertaken you. But I detaine you and the reader too long with Prefacing, I ſhall therefore preſently without more adoe addreſſe my ſelfe unto the encounter with you.

In three places you except againſt D. Twiſſe. I ſhall conſider them ſeverally.

To begin with the firſt.