All candidates
Waiting for reviewvv → wCandidate #27982 · from the Puritas diff · puritas-full-2026-10-19
vvifeswifes
Two v's (or u's) for w: vvhich → which.
- Puritas changed it
- 3 times in 3 works
- Consistency
- 100% (3 of 3)
- Reach if approved
- ~3 places (estimated)
- MorphAdorner
- Disagrees: wives
- Matches
- Exact word, any case
- In our text
- 3 times in the 7,099 works compared
- Other readings
- None
- Taken into joins
- None
If approved, its rationale reads: “Suggested by the Puritas diff (3 changes in 3 works, 100% consistent).”
Where Puritas made the change (3 of 3)
Our text, as printed and with the candidate applied
- Printed… was, he broke the Cloſe of the VVife, and the graffe thereof the ſaid VVifesWifes, did …atdown, and the Declaration was, whileſt ſhe was unmarried, and the VVrit was …With rule… was, he broke the Cloſe of the VVife, and the graffe thereof the ſaid VVifesWifes, did …atdown, and the Declaration was, whileſt ſhe was unmarried, and the VVrit was …
John Kitchin · Jurisdictions · p. 469 · Open in the reader
- Printed… that the method which men uſed in removing, was, firſt to ſend away their VVifesWifes and Children, (as being their greateſt treaſure); next to them, their Writings of conſequence …With rule… that the method which men uſed in removing, was, firſt to ſend away their VVifesWifes and Children, (as being their greateſt treaſure); next to them, their Writings of conſequence …
Samuel Rolle · The Burning of London · p. 821 · Open in the reader
- Printed… dealeth vvith him as vvith the principall, because his gifts vvere greater then his vvifeswifes.With rule… dealeth vvith him as vvith the principall, because his gifts vvere greater then his vvifeswifes.
James Ussher · A Body of Divinity · p. 138 · Open in the reader
Read-only. Sign in as a reviewer to approve or dismiss candidates.
Places Puritas left as printed: likely exceptions (0)
None: wherever Puritas had this word on its own, it changed it.