All candidates
Waiting for reviewvv → wCandidate #27931 · from the Puritas diff · puritas-full-2026-10-19
vvalsynghamwalsyngham
Two v's (or u's) for w: vvhich → which.
- Puritas changed it
- 3 times in 2 works
- Consistency
- 100% (3 of 3)
- Reach if approved
- ~3 places (estimated)
- MorphAdorner
- Disagrees: uvalsyngham
- Matches
- Exact word, any case
- In our text
- 3 times in the 7,099 works compared
- Other readings
- None
- Taken into joins
- None
If approved, its rationale reads: “Suggested by the Puritas diff (3 changes in 2 works, 100% consistent).”
Where Puritas made the change (3 of 3)
Our text, as printed and with the candidate applied
- PrintedRoberti VValsynghamWalsynghamWith ruleRoberti VValsynghamWalsyngham
Thomas Fuller · The History of the Worthies of England · p. 265 · Open in the reader
- Printed… in his lyfe go on pylgrymage as menne vse now a dayes to Caūterburye / VvalsynghamWalsyngham / Compostell / and Rome / or to anye other place els.With rule… in his lyfe go on pylgrymage as menne vse now a dayes to Caūterburye / VvalsynghamWalsyngham / Compostell / and Rome / or to anye other place els.
John Bale · Brief Chronicle Concerning Examination and Death of John Oldcastle · Open in the reader
- PrintedPrioris de VValsynghamWalsynghamWith rulePrioris de VValsynghamWalsyngham
Thomas Fuller · The History of the Worthies of England · p. 265 · Open in the reader
Read-only. Sign in as a reviewer to approve or dismiss candidates.
Places Puritas left as printed: likely exceptions (0)
None: wherever Puritas had this word on its own, it changed it.