Rules
All candidates
Waiting for reviewvv → wCandidate #27861 · from the Puritas diff · puritas-full-2026-10-19

foreknovvforeknow

Two v's (or u's) for w: vvhich → which.

Puritas changed it
3 times in 2 works
Consistency
100% (3 of 3)
Reach if approved
~3 places (estimated)
MorphAdorner
Agrees: foreknow
Matches
Exact word, any case
In our text
3 times in the 7,099 works compared
Other readings
None
Taken into joins
None

If approved, its rationale reads: “Suggested by the Puritas diff (3 changes in 2 works, 100% consistent).”

Where Puritas made the change (3 of 3)

Our text, as printed and with the candidate applied
  1. Printed
    … to that which might be falſe? This would neceſſarily follow, if God did not foreknovvforeknow the motions of mens Wills, whereby many of his Predictions were fulfilled, and ſome …
    With rule
    … to that which might be falſe? This would neceſſarily follow, if God did not foreknovvforeknow the motions of mens Wills, whereby many of his Predictions were fulfilled, and ſome …

    Stephen Charnock · Existence and Attributes of God · p. 298 · Open in the reader

  2. Printed
    I. God did foreknovvforeknow and foreſee all thinges from the beginning.
    With rule
    I. God did foreknovvforeknow and foreſee all thinges from the beginning.

    Girolamo Zanchi · Confession of the Christian Religion · p. 14 · Open in the reader

  3. Printed
    … vvhich depended upon the Will of Cyrus; and vvhy may not an infinite God foreknovvforeknow the free acts of all men, as vvell as of one? If the liberty …
    With rule
    … vvhich depended upon the Will of Cyrus; and vvhy may not an infinite God foreknovvforeknow the free acts of all men, as vvell as of one? If the liberty …

    Stephen Charnock · Existence and Attributes of God · p. 298 · Open in the reader

Read-only. Sign in as a reviewer to approve or dismiss candidates.

Places Puritas left as printed: likely exceptions (0)

None: wherever Puritas had this word on its own, it changed it.