All candidates
Waiting for reviewvv → wCandidate #27651 · from the Puritas diff · puritas-full-2026-10-19
avnsvveravnswer
Two v's (or u's) for w: vvhich → which.
- Puritas changed it
- 5 times in 2 works
- Consistency
- 100% (5 of 5)
- Reach if approved
- ~5 places (estimated)
- MorphAdorner
- Disagrees: answer
- Matches
- Exact word, any case
- In our text
- 5 times in the 7,099 works compared
- Other readings
- None
- Taken into joins
- None
If approved, its rationale reads: “Suggested by the Puritas diff (5 changes in 2 works, 100% consistent).”
Where Puritas made the change (3 of 5)
Our text, as printed and with the candidate applied
- PrintedTHE AVNSVVERAVNSWER.With ruleTHE AVNSVVERAVNSWER.
Theodore Beza · Display of Popish Practices · p. 201 · Open in the reader
- PrintedAN AVNSVVERAVNSWER TO GEORGE GIFFORDS PRETENDED DEFENCE OF READ PRAYERS AND DEVIsed Leitourgies with the vngodly …With ruleAN AVNSVVERAVNSWER TO GEORGE GIFFORDS PRETENDED DEFENCE OF READ PRAYERS AND DEVIsed Leitourgies with the vngodly …
John Greenwood · Answer to Giffords Defense of Read Prayers · Open in the reader
- PrintedTHE AVNSVVERAVNSWER.With ruleTHE AVNSVVERAVNSWER.
Theodore Beza · Display of Popish Practices · p. 165 · Open in the reader
Read-only. Sign in as a reviewer to approve or dismiss candidates.
Places Puritas left as printed: likely exceptions (0)
None: wherever Puritas had this word on its own, it changed it.