The Doctrine of Justification By Faith, Chapter 18 · Exegesis 1
Rom. Chap. 4.
In the beginning of the fourth Chapter he confirms what he had before doctrinally declared, by a signal instance; and this was of the Justification of Abraham, who being the Father of the Faithful, his Justification is proposed as the pattern of ours, as he expresly declares vers. 22, 23, 24. And some few things I shall observe on this instance in our passage unto the fifth Verse; where I shall fix our Discourse.
1. He denies that Abraham was justified by Works, vers. 2. And (1.) These Works were not those of the Jewish Law, which alone some pretend to be excluded from our Justification in this place. For they were the Works he performed some hundreds of years before the giving of the Law at Sinai: wherefore they are the Works of his Moral Obedience unto God that are intended. (2.) Those Works must be understood which Abraham had then, when he is said to be justified in the Testimony produced unto that purpose; But the Works that Abraham then had, were Works of Righteousness, performed in Faith and Love to God, Works of New Obedience under the Conduct and aids of the Spirit of God; Works required in the Covenant of Grace. These are the Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham. And these things are plain, express and evident, not to be eluded by any Distinctions or Evasions. All Abraham's Evangelical Works are expresly excluded from his Justification before God.
2. He proves by the Testimony of Scripture, declaring the Nature and Grounds of the Justification of Abraham, that he was justified no other way, but that which he had before declared, namely by Grace through Faith in Christ Jesus, vers. 3. Abraham believed God (in the Promise of Christ and his Mediation) and it was counted unto him for righteousness, vers. 3. He was justified by Faith in the way before described (for other Justification by Faith there is none) in opposition unto all his own Works, and Personal Righteousness thereby.
3. From the same Testimony he declares how he came to be Partaker of that Righteousness whereon he was justified before God, which was by imputation; it was counted or imputed unto him for Righteousness. The Nature of Imputation hath been before declared.
4. The especial Nature of this Imputation, namely that it is of Grace without respect unto Works, he asserts and proves, vers. 4. from what is …ntrary thereunto, Now to him that worketh is the reward …ot reckon'd of Grace, but of Debt. Where Works are of any consideration, there is no room for that kind of Imputation whereby Abraham was justified, for it was a gracious Imputation, and that is not of what is our own antecedently thereunto, but what is made our own by that Imputation. For what is our own cannot be imputed unto us in a way of Grace, but only reckon'd ours in a way of Debt. That which is our own with all the effects of it, is due unto us. And therefore they who plead that Faith it self is imputed unto us, to give some countenance unto an Imputation of Grace, do say it is imputed not for what it is, for then it would be reckoned of Debt, but for what it is not. So Socinus, Cum fides imputatur nobis pro justitia, ideo imputatur quia nec ipsa fides justitia est, nec vere in se eam continet, De Servat. Part. 4. cap. 2. which kind of Imputation being indeed only a false Imagination, we have before disproved. But all works are inconsistent with that Imputation whereby Abraham was justified. It is otherwise with him that worketh, so as thereon to be justified, then it was with him. Yea, say some, all Works that are meritorious, that are performed with an opinion of Merit, that make the Reward to be of debt, are excluded, but other Works are not. This distinction is not learned from the Apostle. For according unto him, if this be merit and meritorious, that the Reward be reckon'd of Debt, then all Works in Justification are so. For without distinction or limitation he affirms, that unto him that worketh, the reward is not reckon'd of Grace, but of Debt. He doth not exclude some sort of Works, or Works in some sense, because they would make the reward of Debt, but affirms that all would do so unto the exclusion of gracious Imputation. For if the foundation of Imputation be in our selves, Imputation by Grace is excluded. In the fifth Verse the Sum of the Apostles Doctrine, which he had contended for, and what he had proved, is expressed. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his Faith is counted for Righteousness. It is granted on all hands, that the close of the Verse his Faith is counted for Righteousness, doth express the Justification of the person intended. He is justified, and the way of it is, his Faith is counted or imputed. Wherefore the foregoing words declare the Subject of Justification, and its qualification, or the description of the Person to be justified with all that is required on his part thereunto.
And first, it is said of him, that he is, foreign; who worketh not. It is not required unto his Justification that he should not work, that he should not perform any Duties of Obedience unto God in any kind, which is working. For every person in the world is always obliged unto all Duties of Obedience, according to the light and knowledg of the Will of God, the means whereof is afforded unto him. But the expression is to be limited by the Subject matter treated of. He who worketh not, with respect unto Justification; though not the design of the Person, but the Nature of the thing is intended. To say, he who worketh not is justified through believing, is to say that his Works whatever they be, have no influence into his Justification, nor hath God in justifying of him any respect unto them. Wherefore he alone who worketh not, is the subject of Justification, the person to be justified; that is, God considereth no mans Works, no mans Duties of Obedience in his Justification; seeing we are justified foreign, freely by his Grace. And when God affirmeth expresly, that he justifieth him who worketh not, and that freely by his Grace, I cannot understand what place our Works or Duties of Obedience, can have in our Justification. For why should we trouble our selves to invent of what consideration they may be in our Justification before God, when he himself affirms, that they are of none at all. Neither are the words capable of any evading interpretation. He that worketh not, is he that worketh not, let men say what they please, and distinguish as long as they will. And it is a boldness not to be justified, for any to rise up in opposition unto such express Divine Testimonies, however they may be harnessed with Philosophical Notions and arguings, which are but as Thorns and Briars, which the Word of God will pass through and consume.
But the Apostle further adds in the description of the Subject of Justification that God justifieth the ungodly. This is that expression which hath stirred up so much wrath amongst many, and on the account whereof, some seem to be much displeased with the Apostle himself. If any other person dare but say that God justifieth the ungodly, he is presently reflected on, as one that by his Doctrine would overthrow the necessity of Godliness, Holiness, Obedience, or Good Works. For what need can there be of any of them, if God justifieth the ungodly? Howbeit this is a Periphrasis of God that he is foreign he that justifieth the ungodly; this is his Prerogative and Property, as such will he be believed in and worshipped, which adds weight and Emphasis unto the Expression. And we must not foregoe this Testimony of the Holy Ghost, let men be as angry as they please.
But the difference is about the meaning of the words. If so, it may be allowed without mutual offence, though we should mistake their proper sense. Only it must be granted, that God justifieth the ungodly. That is, say some, those who formerly were ungodly, not those who continue ungodly when they are justified. And this is most true. All that are justified were before ungodly; and all that are justified are at the same instant made Godly. But the question is, whether they are Godly or Ʋngodly antecedently in any moment of time unto their Justification; if they are considered as Godly, and are so indeed, then the Apostles words are not true, that God justifieth the ungodly; for the contradictory Proposition is true, God justifieth none but the Godly. For these Propositions, God justifieth the ungodly, and God justifieth none but the Godly, are contradictory. For here are expresly foreign & foreign, which is foreign.
Wherefore, although in and with the Justification of a Sinner, he is made Godly, for he is endowed with that Faith which purifieth the heart, and is a vital Principle of all Obedience, and the Conscience is purged from Dead Works by the Blood of Christ; yet antecedently unto his Justification he is ungodly and considered as ungodly, as one that worketh not, as one whose Duties and Obedience contribute nothing unto his Justification. As he worketh not, all works are excluded from being the causa per quam; and as he is ungodly, from being the causa sine qua non of his Justification.
The Qualification of the Subject, or the means on the part of the person to be justified, and whereby he becomes actually so to be, is Faith or believing. But believeth on him who justifieth the ungodly. That is, it is Faith alone. For it is the Faith of him who worketh not; and not only so, but its especial object, God as justifying the ungodly, is exclusive of the concomitancy of any works whatever.
This is Faith alone, or it is impossible to express Faith alone, without the literal use of that word alone. But Faith being asserted, in opposition unto all works of ours, unto him that worketh not, and its especial nature declared in its especial object, God as justifying the ungodly, that is, freely by his Grace, through the Redemption that is in Christ Jesus, no place is left for any Works to make the least approach towards our Justification before God, under the covert of any distinction whatever. And the nature of Justifying Faith is here also determined. It is not a meer assent unto Divine Revelations; it is not such a firm assent unto them, as should cause us to yield Obedience unto all the Precepts of the Scripture, though these things are included in it; but it is a believing on, and trusting unto him that justifieth the ungodly, through the Mediation of Christ.
Concerning this Person, the Apostle affirmeth that his Faith is counted for Righteousness. That is, he is justified in the way and manner before declared. But there is a difference about the Sense of these words. Some say, the meaning of them is, that Faith as an Act, a Grace, a Duty or Work of ours, is so imputed. Others say, that it is Faith as it apprehends Christ and his Righteousness, which is properly imputed unto us, that is intended. So Faith they say justifieth, or is counted for Righteousness relatively, not properly, with respect unto its object; and so acknowledg a Trope in the words. And this is fiercely opposed, as though they denied the express words of the Scripture, when yet they do but interpret this expression once only used, by many others, wherein the same thing is declared. But those who are for the first sense, do all affirm that Faith here is to be taken as including Obedience or Works, either as the form and essence of it, or as such necessary concomitants as have the same influence with it into our Justification, or are in the same manner the condition of it. But as herein they admit also of a Trope in the words which they so fiercely blame in others, so they give this sense of the whole, unto him that worketh not, but believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly, his Faith and Works are counted to him for Righteousness; which is not only to deny what the Apostle affirms, but to assign unto him a plain contradiction.
And, I do a little marvel that any unprejudiced person, should expound this Solitary Expression in such a sense, as is contradictory unto the design of the Apostle, the words of the same Period, and the whole ensuing Context. For that which the Apostle proposeth unto confirmation, which contains his whole design, is, that we are justified by the Righteousness which is of God by Faith in the blood of Christ. That this cannot be Faith it self, shall immediately be made evident; And in the words of the Text, all Works are excluded, if any words be sufficient to exclude them. But Faith absolutely as a single Grace, Act and Duty of ours, much more as it includeth Obedience in it, is a Work, and in the later sense it is all Works. And in the ensuing Context, he proves that Abraham was not justified by Works. But not to be justified by Works, and to be justified by some Works, as Faith it self is a Work; and if as such it be imputed unto us for Righteousness, we are justified by it as such; are contradictory. Wherefore I shall oppose some few Arguments unto this feigned sense of the Apostles words.
1. To believe absolutely, as Faith is an Act and Duty of of ours, and Works, are not opposed; for Faith is a Work an especial kind of Working. But Faith as we are justified by it, and Works, or to Work, are opposed. To him that worketh not, but believeth. So Gal. 2.16. Eph. 2.8.
2. It is the Righteousness of God that is imputed unto us. For we are made the Righteousness of God in Christ, 2 Cor. 5.21. The Righteousness of God upon them that believe, Rom. 3.21, 22. But Faith absolutely considered, is not the Righteousness of God, God imputeth unto us Righteousness without Works, Rom. 4.16. But there is no intimation of a double Imputation of two sorts of Righteousnesses, of the Righteousness of God, and that which is not so. Now Faith absolutely considered, is not The Righteousness of God. For,
1. That whereunto the Righteousness of God is revealed, whereby we believe and receive it, is not its self the Righteousness of God. For nothing can be the cause or means of of it self: But the Righteousness of God is revealed unto Faith, Rom. 1.16. And by it is it received, Rom. 3.22. Chap. 5.11.
2. Faith is not the Righteousness of God which is by Faith: But the Righteousness of God which is imputed unto us is, the Righteousness of God which is by Faith, Rom. 3.22. Phil. 3.9.
3. That whereby the Righteousness of God is to be sought, obtained, and submitted unto, is not that Righteousness it self. But such is Faith, Rom. 9.30, 31. Chap. 10.30.
4. The Righteousness which is imputed unto us, is not our own antecedently unto that Imputation. That I may be found in him, not having my own Righteousness, Phil. 3.9. But Faith is a mans own. Shew me thy Faith, I will shew thee my Faith, Jam. 2.18.
5. God imputeth Righteousness unto us, Rom. 4.6. And that Righteousness which God imputeth unto us, is the Righteousness whereby we are justified, for it is imputed unto us that we may be justified. But we are justified by the Obedience and Blood of Christ. By the Obedience of one we are made Righteous, Rom. 5.19. Much more now being justified by his Blood, v. 9. He hath put away Sin by the Sacrifice of himself, Heb. 9.26. Isai. 53.11. By his knowledg shall my righteous Servant justifie many, for he shall bear their Iniquities. But Faith is neither the Obedience, nor the Blood of Christ.
6. Faith, as we said before, is our own. And that which is our own may be imputed unto us. But the discourse of the Apostle is about that which is not our own antecedently unto Imputation, but is made ours thereby, as we have proved; for it is of Grace. And the Imputation of what is really our own unto us antecedently unto that Imputation, is not of Grace in the sense of the Apostle. For what is so imputed, is imputed for what it is, and nothing else. For that Imputation is but the Judgment of God concerning the thing imputed, with respect unto them whose it is. So the Fact of Phineas was imputed unto him for Righteousness. God judged it, and declared it to be a Righteous rewardable act. Wherefore if our Faith and Obedience be imputed unto us, that Imputation is only the Judgment of God that we are Believers and Obedient. The Righteousness of the Righteous, saith the Prophet, shall be upon him and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him, Ezek. 18.20. As the wickedness of the wicked is upon him, or is imputed unto him, so the Righteousness of the Righteous is upon him, or is imputed unto him. And the wickedness of the wicked is on him, when God judgeth him wicked as his Works are. So is the Righteousness of a man upon him, or imputed unto him, when God judgeth of his Righteousness as it is. Wherefore if Faith absolutely considered, be imputed unto us as it contains in it self, or as it is accompanied with Works of Obedience: then it is imputed unto us, either for a perfect Righteousness which it is not, or for an imperfect Righteousness which it is; or the Imputation of it, is the accounting of that to be a perfect Righteousness, which is but imperfect; but none of these can be affirmed.
1. It is not imputed unto us for a perfect Righteousness, the Righteousness required by the Law, for so it is not. Episcopius confesseth in his disputation, Disput. 43. §. 7, 8. that the Righteousness which is imputed unto us must be absolutissima & perfectissima, most absolute and most perfect. And thence he thus defineth the Imputation of Righteousness unto us, name]y that it is, gratiosa Divinae mentis aestimatio, qua credentem in filium suum, eo loco reputat ac si perfecte justus esset ac legi & voluntati ejus per omnia semper paruisset. And no man will pretend, that Faith is such a most absolute and most perfect righteousness, as that by it the Righteousness of the Law should be fulfilled in us, as it is by that Righteousness which is imputed unto us.
2. It is not imputed unto us for what it is, an imperfect Righteousness. For, (1.) This would be of no advantage unto us. For we cannot be justified before God by an imperfect Righteousness, as is evident in the Prayer of the Psalmist, Psal. 143.2. Enter not into judgment with thy servant, for in thy sight no man living, (no Servant of thine who hath the most perfect, or highest measure of imperfect Righteousness) shall be justified. (2.) The Imputation of any thing unto us, that was ours antecedently unto that Imputation, for what it is, and no more, is contrary unto the Imputation described by the Apostle, as hath been proved.
3. This Imputation pleaded for, cannot be a judging of that to be a perfect Righteousness which is imperfect. For the Judgment of God is according to Truth. But without judging it to be such, it cannot be accepted as such. To accept of any thing, but only for what we judg it to be, is to be deceived.
Lastly, if Faith, as a Work be imputed unto us, then it must be as a Work wrought in Faith. For no other Work is accepted with God. Then must that Faith also wherein it is wrought be imputed unto us; for that also is Faith and a good Work. That therefore must have another Faith from whence it must proceed. And so in infinitum.
Many other things there are in the ensuing Explication of the Justification of Abraham, the nature of his Faith and his Righteousness before God, with the application of them unto all that do believe, which may be justly pleaded unto the same purpose with those passages of the Context which we have insisted on. But if every Testimony should be pleaded which the Holy Ghost hath given unto this Truth, there would be no end of writing. One thing more I shall observe and put an end unto our discourse on this Chapter.
Vers. 6, 7, 8. The Apostle pursues his Argument to prove the freedom of our Justification by Faith, without respect unto Works, through the Imputation of Righteousness in the instance of pardon of Sin, which essentially belongeth thereunto. And this he doth by the Testimony of the Psalmist, who placeth the blessedness of a man in the Remission of Sins. His design is not thereby to declare the full nature of Justification, which he had done before, but only to prove the freedom of it from any respect unto Works in the instance of that essential part of it. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness without Works (which was the only thing he designed to prove by this Testimony) saying, Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven. He describes their blessedness by it, not that their whole blessedness doth consist therein; but this concurs unto it wherein no respect can possibly be had unto any Works whatever. And he may justly from hence describe the blessedness of a man, in that the Imputation of Righteousness, and the Non-Tmputation of Sin (both which the Apostle mentioneth distinctly) wherein his whole blessedness as unto justification doth consist, are inseparable. And because Remission of Sin is the first part of Justification, and the principal part of it, and hath the Imputation of Righteousness always accompanying it, the blessedness of a man may be well described thereby. Yea, whereas all Spiritual Blessings go together in Christ, Eph. 1.3. A mans blessedness may be described by any of them. But yet the Imputation of Righteousness, and the Remission of Sin are not the same, no more than Righteousness imputed, and Sin remitted are the same. Nor doth the Apostle propose them as the same, but mentioneth them distinctly, both being equally necessary unto our compleat Justification, as hath been proved.