Reader
Aarons Rod Blossoming · George Gillespie

Aarons Rod Blossoming, Book 3 · Chapter 18

CHAP. XVIII. A Discovery of the instability and loosenesse of Mr. Prynn his Principles, even to the contradicting of himself in twelve particulars.

I Shall not need to insist upon his tenth point of difference Vindic. pag. 49. nor upon his four following Quaerees and Conclusion, in all which there is no new material point, but a repetition of divers particulars spoken to and debated else-where. As touching that hint of a new Argument pag. 56. Consider the Parabl… of the mariage of the Kings son, where the King sent forth his servants to invite guests to the wedding Supper, who gathered together ALL they found, both BAD and good, that the wedding might be furnished with guests. Matth. 22. 1. to 11. I answer, 1. Some understand here by the bad vers. 10. those who had formerly (before they were called and brought home by the Gospel) been the worst and most vicious among the Heathens, so that the words both bad and good make not a distinction of two sorts of Christians or Church-members, but of two sorts of Heathens not yet called, some of them were good, some of them bad comparitively, that is, some of them much better then others, some of them much worse. So Grotius, and long before him Hierome and Theophylact upon the place. 2. Others (as Bucerus, Tossanus, Cartwright, oIn Matth. 22. Neque enim apertos ac palam malos, Apostoli aut ulli sancti Evangelii praecones congregare, & Ecclesiae communioni per Sacramenta aggregare potuerunt aut congregarunt, quod tales a communione Ecclesiae tanquam pestes illius sint arcendi, sed congregarunt opertos ac…ectos, quos quia sub ovina pelle sunt lupi & sub externa fidei & vitae …bristianae specie, internam fraudem ac impietatem tegunt (atque ita vere bonis exterius pares, imo interdum superiores apparent) idcirco ab Apostolis aliisque Evangelii praeconibus dignosci non potuerunt. &c.Gomarus) understand by the bad, close Hypocrites who appear good so far as the Ministers and Officers of the Church are able to judge of them. These by a Synecdoche of the Genus for the Species may be understood by the bad. And so the Text will not comprehend scandalous and known prophane persons. That Synecdoche generis, is often used in Scripture, is proved by Sal. Glassius Philolog. sacrae lib. 5. Tract. 1. Cap. 14.

3. I throw back an Argument from the same Parable against himself, for the King sheweth his servants that he will have unworthy persons kept back from the marriage feast, vers. 8. Then saith he to his servants, the Wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy, Luk. 14. 24. For I say unto unto you, that none of those men which were bidden shall tast of my Supper. The King makes it also known that he alloweth none to come in to this Mariage Feast, except such onelyonly as have the Wedding garment (or as the Syriak Wedding garments) upon them. All which is inconsistent with Mr. Prynns principles concerning the admission of known scandalous unworthy persons to the Sacrament, as to a converting Ordinance.

4. And if all must be brought in or let in to the Lords Supper, both bad and good promiseuously and without distinction, then it should follow that the Ordinances of Parliament concerning the suspension of all sorts of scandalous persons from the Sacrament are contrary to the Will of Christ: And that Mr. Prynn himself in yeelding …ag. 50. and else-where, that scandalous impenitent obstinate persons ought to be not onelyonly suspended but excommunicated, doth yeeld what his Argument concludes to be unlawful. And so I come to that which I have here proposed, viz. the instability and loosenesse of Mr. Prynns principles in this controversie.

By comparing divers passages together, I find that he doth professe and pretend to yeeld the Question, which yet he doth not yeeld really and indeed.

First, It is to be observed that he deserteth Erastus and that party in the point of Excommunication. For in the vindication of his four Questions pag. 2. he readily yeeldeth that grosse notorious scandalous obstinate sinners, who presumptuously persevere in their iniquities, after private and publike admonitions, without remorse of Conscience or AMENDMENT, may be justly excommunicated from the Church, the society of the faithful, and all publike Ordinances, after due proof and legal conviction of their scandalous lives: and that 1. Cor. 5. 13. warrants thus much. The Antidote animadverted by P. in the first page yeeldeth that excommunication is an Ordinance of God. And indeed 1 Cor. 5. 13. doth not onelyonly warrant excommunication as lawful, but injoyn and command it as necessary; for the Apostles words are praeceptive and peremptory: Therefore put away from among your selves that wicked person. The thing was not indifferent, but necessary and such as could not without sin be omitted. However Mr. Prynn his asserting from that place that it may be, is a deserting of the Erastian party.

2. In the 50. page of his vindication he professeth that his Antagonists do contend for that which he granteth them with advantage. They would have scandalous sinners suspended from the Sacrament. He will have them not onelyonly suspended from the Sacrament, but excommunicated from all other publike Ordinances.

3. He confesseth ibid. that in some cases a person not excommunicated may be suspended from the Sacrament.

But whatever his Concessions may seem to be, they are really as good as nothing. For 1. He will have none to be suspended from the Sacrament except such as are ripe for excommunication, and against whom the sentence of excommunication is ready to be pronounced as persons incorrigible. 2. He admitteth no suspension from the Sacrament till after several solemn previous publike admonitions, reprehensions, rebukes contemned or neglected. See both these pag. 50. Whence you see that with Mr. Prynns consent all the votes of Parliament concerning several causes of suspension from the Lords Table, shall be of no use to Presbyteries, until after a long processe of time, and after many previous publike admonitions, So that if one in the Congregation commit a notorious incest or murther a day or two, or a week before the celebration of the Sacrament, and the thing be undeniably certified and proved before the Eldership, yet the Eldership cannot suspend such an abominable scandalous sinner from the Sacrament, hac vice: but must first go through all those preparatory steps which are necessary and requisite before excommunication.

Well: but after all those publike previous admonitions, shall the sentence of excommunication follow? Nay, here also he will have Presbyteries to go through a very narrow lane: for in the same place he thus describeth the persons whom he would have to be excommunicated; They are scandalous, obstinate, peremptory, incorrigible, notorious sinners, who desperately and professedly persevere in their grosse scandalous sins, &c. But I beseech you, what if they persevere in their grosse scandalous sins neither desperately nor professedly? Must they not then be excommunicate? Shall not the offender be cast out of the Church after clear proof of the offence, and several previous publike admonitions contemned or neglected? Must we wait till the adulterer professe that he will persevere in his adultery; and till the blasphemer professe that he will persevere in his blasphemy? Nay further, What if the offender do neither … nor actually persevere in his grosse scandalous sin? Put case he that hath blasphemed once do not blaspheme the second time: and that he who grossely and scandalously prophaned the Lords day, did it but once, and hath not done it again since he was reproved. Must this hinder the sentence of excommunication, when that one grosse scandal is not confessed, nor any signe of repentance appearing in the offender?

Moreover whereas Mr. Prynn in his fourth Quare, and in several places of his Vindication seemeth to allow none to be admitted to the Lords Table except such as professe sincere repentance for sins past, and promise newnesse of life for time to come. If we expound his meaning by his own expressions in other places, that which he granteth bordereth upon nothing: for pag. 13. speaking of scandalous sinners their admission to the Sacrament, if they professe sincere repentance for their sins past, and reformation of their lives for time to come, he addeth, as all do at least in their general confessions before the Sacrament, if not in their private meditations, prayers, &c. and a little after he saith, that all who come to receive, do alwaies make a general and joynt confession of their sins before God and the Congregation &c. And then he addeth pag. 14. Yea I dare presume, there is no receiver so desperate, that dares professe when he comes to receive, he is not heartily sorry for his sins past, but resolves to persevere impenitently in them for the future, though afterward he relapse into them, as the best Saints do to their old infirmities &c. I know the best Saints have their sinful infirmities, but whether the BEST do relapse to their OLD infirmities may be a Question. And however he doth open a wide door for receiving to the Sacrament all scandalous sinners not excommunicated, if they do but tacitely joyn in the general Confession of sins made by the whole Church, or do not contradict those general Confessions, and professe impenitency and persevering in wickednesse, though in the mean time there be manifest real symptomes of impenitency, and no confession made of that particular sin which hath given publike scandal. Wherefore I say plainly with the Professors of Leyden, Synops. Pur. Theol. Disp. 48. Thes. 35. The administration of this censure of suspension from the Lords Table hath place in these two different cases, either when one that is called a Brother hath given some hainous scandal of life or Doctrine, who after admonition doth indeed by word of mouth professe repentance, but yet doth not sh…w the fruits meet for repentance, that so the scandal might be taken away from the Church: or when he doth not so much as in words promise or professe repentance, &c. Martin Bucer hath a notable speech to this purpose de Regno Christi, lib. 1. Cap. 9. To hold it enough that one do professe by Word onelyonly repentance of sins, and say that he is sorry for his sins, and that he will amend his life, the necessarie signes and works of Repentance not being joyned with such profession, It is the part of Antichrists priests, not of Christs.

In the next place it is to be taken notice of, how palpably and grossely Mr. Prynn contradicteth himself in divers particulars: Which being observed, may peradventure make himself more attentive in writing, and others more attentive in reading such subitane lucubrations. The particulars are these which follow.

1. Vindicat, pag. 17. he saith, the Confession of sin which was made at the Trespasse offerings, was not to the Priest, Classis, or Congregation, but to God alone.1. In the very same page he saith, None were kept off from making their atonement by a trespasse offering, if they did first confesse their sins to God, though perchance his confession was not cordiall, or such as the Priests approved, but external onelyonly in shew. I beseech you how could it be at all judged of, whether it was external and onelyonly in shew, if it was made to God alone? Nay, if it was made to God alone, how could it be known whether he had confessed any sin at all; and so whether he was to be admitted to the trespasse offering or not?
2. Vindic. pag. 50. He freely granteth That ALL scandalous, obstinate, peremptory, incorrigible, notorious sinners, who desperately and professedly persevere in their grosse scandalous fins, to the dishonour of Christian Religion, the scandal of the Congregation, the ill example and infection of others, after several solemn previous publike admonitions, reprehensions, rebukes, contemned or neglected, and full conviction of their scandal and2. Vindic. pag. 57. Certainly the speediest, BEST and ONLY WAY to suppresse ALL kind of sins, schismes, to reform and purge our Churches from ALL SCANDALOUS OFFENCES, will be for Ministers NOT to draw out the sword of Excommunication and suspension against them, which will do little good, but the sword of the Spirit, the powerful preaching of Gods Word, and the sword of the Civil Magistrate.
impenitency, may and OUGHT TO BE EXCOMMUNICATED, suspended, &c.If this be the best and only way to suppresse sin, and to reform and purge the Churches, How is it that some scandalous sinners may and ought to be excommunicated?
3. Vindic. pag. 50 Where the f…ct is notorious, the p…oofs …, the sentence of excommunication ready to be pronounced against them as persons impenitently scandalous and in…orrigible, …erchance the Presbyterie or …l ssis may order a suspension from the Sacrament, or any other Ordinances, before the sentence of excommunication solemnly denounced if they see just cause.3. Yet all along he disputes against the su pending from the Sacrament of a person unexcommunicated, and not suspended from all other publike Ord nances and society of Gods people. And pag 50. arguing for the right of all visible members of the visible Church to the Sacrament, he saith that nothing but an actual excommunication can suspend them from this their rig…t.
4. Vindic. pag. 17. He saith that a particular examination of the Conscience, and Repentance for sin, is no where required in Scripture of such who did eat the Passeover. And herein he distinguisheth the Trespasse-offerings, and the Passeover, that in bringing a trespasse offering men came to sue for pardon, and make atonement, and that therefore confession of sin was necessary. But in the Passeover4. Ibid. pag. 24. He saith that the Passeover was the same in substance with the Eucharist under the Gospel, wherein Christ was spiritually represented and received, as well as in the Lords Supper. But how can this be, if repentance for sin was not necessary in the Passeover, and if it was onelyonly a commemoration of a by▪ p…st temporal mercy in sparing the first born of the Israelites?
there was r… atonement &c. but ONELYONLY a commemoration of Gods infinite mercy in passing over the Israelites first born when he sl…w the Egyptians.
5. Vindic. pag. 18. He saith that immediatly before the institution of the Sacrament, Christ told his Disciples that one of them should betray him, and that Iudas was the last man that said Is it I? immediately before the Institution. And pag. 27. he saith. That the other disciples did eat the Sacrament with Iudas, after Christ had particularly informed them and Iudas himself, that he should betray him.5. Yet pag. 25. He reckoneth that very thing to have been after the Institution of the Sacrament: for to that Objection that Iudas went out before Supper ended, immediately after he received the sop, whereas Christ did not institute the Sacrament till after Supper: he makes this answer, that the dipping of the sop (at which time Iudas said is it I?) was at the common Supper, which (saith he) succeded the Institution of the Sacrament, so that the Sacrament was instituted after the Paschal, not after the common Supper. And pag. 19. He argues that Iudas did receive the Sacrament upon this ground, that all this discourse and the giving of the sop to Judas was after Supper ended; but Christ instituted and distributed the Sacrament (at least the bread) as he sate at meat, as they were eating, before Supper quite ended.
6. Vindic. pag. 42. Speaking of ungodly scandalous sinners, he plainly intimateth that the receiving of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is more likely to regenerate and change their hearts and lives then the Word preached. And in that same page, he holdeth that this Sacrament is certainly the most powerful and effectual Ordinance of all others to humble, regenerate, convert. The like see pag. 44, 45. and pag. 52. Yea no doubt many debosht Persons have been really reclaimed, converted, even by their accesse and admission to the Sacrament.6. Pag. 57. He ascribeth the power of godlinesse in many English Congregations to powerful preaching, and saith, that this sword of the Spirit, the powerful preaching of Gods Word, and the sword of the Civil Magistrate, are onelyonly able to effect this work, to suppresse all kind of sinnes, schismes, to reform and purge the Churches. If this be the speediest, best, and onelyonly way to suppresse all kind of sinnes, schismes, to reform and purge our Churches from all scandalous offences, as he there saith, and if the Word and the Magistrate are onelyonly able to effect this work; How is it that the Lords Supper doth change mens hearts and lives, and that more effectually then any other Ordinance? Again pag. 37. he saith, he hath in other Treatises of his proved Gods presence and Spirit to be as much, as really present in other Ordinances, as in this of the Lords Supper. How then makes he this Sacrament to be the most powerful and effectual Ordinance of all others, to humble, regenerate, convert?
7. Pag. 40. He makes the Sacrament to be a seal to the sences of unworthy persons, but not to their soules; In this latter sence he saith it is a seal onelyonly to worthy penitent beleeving receivers.7. Yet Pag. 44, 45. the strength of his tenth Argument lies in this, that the Sacrament sealeth unto the Communicants souls, yea to the flintiest heart, and obduratest spirit, the promises, an union with Christ, assurance of everlasting life, and therefore in regard of the sealing of all these particulars unto mens souls, must needs convert an obdurate unregenerate sinner. Which Argument were non-sence if it did not suppose the Sacrament to seal all these particulars even to the souls of unregenerate sinners. Mark but these words of his own; since that which doth seal all these particulars to mens souls, and represent them to their saddest thoughts, must needs more powerfully perswade, pierce, mels, relent, convert an obdurate heart▪ and unregenerate sinner, &c.
8. Vindic. Pag. 28. He admitteth that a Minister ought in duty and Conscience to give warning to unworthy persons of the danger of unworthy approaching to the Lords Table, and seriously dehort them from8. Pag. 46. He tells us of an old error in forbidding drink to those who were inflamed with burning feavers, which Physitians of late have corrected by suffering such to drink freely. He desires that this old
comming to it unless they repent, reform, and come prepared.error of P…isicians may not enter among Divines; for as drink doth extinguish the unnatural heat which else would kill the diseased, so feaverish Christians burning in the flames of sins and lusts ought to be permitted freely to come to the Lords Table, because they need it most to quench their flames. Do these now repent, reform, and come prepared? Yet here he makes it a sin to forbid them to come to the Lords Table. Though he applieth it against suspension: yet the ground he goeth upon makes it a soul murthering sin, so much as to dehort them from that which they need most to quench the flames of their lusts.
9. Vindic. Pag. 37. I answer, First▪ That the Minister doth not administer the Sacrament to any known impenitent sinners under that notion, but onelyonly as penitent sinners, truly repenting of their sins past. The meaning of which words cannot be that the Minister gives the Sacrament to known impenitent sinners, while known to be impenitent, and yet he gives the Sacrament to those known impenitent sinners, not as impenitent,9. This as it casts down what himself hath built in point of the converting Ordinance (for if the Sacrament be not administred to any known impenitent sinners, under that notion, but onelyonly as penitent, then it doth not work but suppose repentance and conversion in the receivers, and so is not a converting Ordinance to any receiver:) So also it is inconsistent with what himself addeth in the very same place. Secondly
but as penitent: which were a mighty strong Bull. But the meaning bust needs be, that the Minister gives the Sacrament to such as have been indeed formerly lookt upon as impenitent sinners, and known to be such, but are now when they come to the Sacrament lookt upon under the notion of penitent sinners, and that the Minister gives the Sacrament to none, except onelyonly under the notion and supposition that they are truly penitent.saith Mr. Prynn, He (the Minister) us…h th…se words, The body of Christ which was broken, and the blood of Christ shedd for you, &c. not absolutely, but conditionally onelyonly, in case they receive the Sacrament worthily, and become penitent▪ and beleeving receivers, as they all professe themselves to be▪ just so as they preach repentan…e and remission to their Auditors; Therefore the case is just, the same in both (the Word preached and the Sacrament) without any difference: Here Christ is offered in the Sacrament, as well as to the Word, and accordingly the Sacrament administred to known impenitent sinners under that notion, and as still known to be impenitent upon condition that they become penitent.
10. Vindic. Pag. 52. It being onelyonly the total exclusion from the Church and all Christian society (not any bare suspension from the Sacrament) which works both shame aud remorse in excommunicate persons, as Paul resolves, 2. Thess. 3. 14. 1 Cor. 5. 13. compared with 1 Cor. 5. 1. to 11.10. Yet Vindic. pag. 4. and 10. he denieth that either 1 Cor. 5. 9. 11. or 2 Thess. 3. 14. can amount to any Excommunication or exclusion from the Church, and expounds both these places of a private withdrawing of Civil Fellowship, without any publike judicial Act or Church censure.
11. In his Epistle to the Reader before his Vindication, he disclaimeth that which some conceived to be his opinion, viz. that the Ministers and elders of Christs Church, ought not to be trusted with the power of Church censures, or that all of them are to be abridged of this power: and professeth that these debates of his tend onelyonly to a regular orderly settlement of the power of Presbyteries, not to take from them all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction due by divine right to them, but to confine it within certain definite limits.11. Diotrephes catechised, pag. 7. It is the safest readiest way to unity and Reformation, to remit the punishment of all scandalous offences to the civil Magistrate, rather then to the pretended disputable questioned authority of Presbyteries, Classes, or Congregations.
12. Vindic. pag. 2. He agreeth with his Opposites that scandalous obstinate sinners after proof and conviction, may be justly excommunicated from the Church &c. And that 1 Cor. 5. 13. warrants thus much &c. So that thus far there is no dissent on either part. Remember the present controversie which he speaks to, is concerning excommunication in England, and so under a Christian Magistracy.12. Diotrephes catechised, pag. 9. 10. He plainly intimateth that 1 Cor. 5. 13. is no satisfactory Argument for the continuance and exercise of Excommunication in all Churches, and where the Magistrates be Christian. And that those who presse this Text, may as well conclude from the very next words, 1 Cor. 6. 1. to 9. that it is unlawful for Christians to go to Law before any Christian Judges now, &c. Where by the way it is also to be noted, that he should have said before any heathen judge…. Otherwise the Argument cannot be parallel.

I shall now close with four Counter-Quaeries to Mr. Prynne.

1. Since diu deliberandum quod semel statuendum, which is a received maxime, approved by prudent men, and God himself, as his Epistle to the Reader saith; whether was it well done to publish his subitane lucubrations (as himself in that preface calls them) and upon so short deliberation to ingage in this publike and litigious manner against the desires of the Reverend and Learned Assembly, especially in a businesse wherein it is well known the hearts of godly people do generally go along with them?

2. Whether Mr. Prynus language be not very much changed from what it was in the Prelats times: seeing Vindic. pag. 7. he hath these words, our opposites generally grant, &c. citing onelyonly Cartwright? And are the old non Conformists of blessed memory, now Opposites? Where are we? I confesse as he now stands affected, he is opposite to the old non-Conformists, and they to him. For instance. Mr. Hildersham Lect. 5. on Psal. 51. holdeth that all open and scandalous sinners should do open and publike repentance, and acknowledge their scandalous sins in the Congregation, otherwise to be kept back from the holy Communion. And while Mr. Prynn pleadeth that Matth. 18. 15, 16, 17. is not meant of a Presbyterie or of any Church-censure, he manifestly dissenteth from the non-Conformist, and joyneth issue with Bpp. Bilson de gubern. Eccl. c. 4. and Sutlivius de Presbyterio cap. 9. pleading for Prelacy against Presbyterie.

3. Seeing the businesse of excommunication and sequestration from the Sacrament, now in publike agitation, is a matter of great moment, much difficulty, and very circumspectly to be handled, established, to prevent pro…anation and scandal on the one hand; and arbitrary, tyrannical, papal domineering power over the Consciences, the spiritual priviledges of Christians, on the other. (These are his own words in the preface of his Quaeries) whether hath he gone in an even path to avoid both these evills? Or whether hath he not declined to the left hand, while he shunned the error of the right hand! Whether hath he not so gone about to cure the heat of the liver,▪ as to leave a cold and phlegmatick stomack uncured? And whether doth he not trespasse against that rule of his owne last cited, when he adviseth this as the best and onelyonly way to suppresse all kind of sins, and to reform and purge the Churches of this Kingdom, that the sword of excommunication and suspension be not drawn, but onelyonly the sword of the spirit, and the sword of the Magistrate? Vindic. pag. 57. Finally, Whether in this Kingdom there be more cause to fear and apprehend an arbitrary, tyrannical, papal domineering power over the Consciences of Christians, (where Church discipline is to be so bounded by authority of Parliament, that it be not promiscuously put in the hands of all, but of such against whom there shall be no just exception found, yea are or shall be chosen by the Congregations themselves, who have also lately abjured by a solemn Covenant, the Popish and Pre…atical Government?) Or whether we ought not to be more afraid and apprehensive that the Ordinances of Christ shall hardly be kept from pollution, and the Churches hardly purged from scandals, there being many thousands both grossely ignorant, and grossely scandalous?

4. I desire it may be (upon a review) seriously considered, how little truth, wisdom, or charity there is in that suggestion of Mr, Prynn, pag. 57. that the lives of the generality of the people are more strict, pious, lesse scandalous and licentious in our English Congregations▪ where there hath been powerful preaching, without the practice of Excommunication or suspension from the Sacrament, then in the Reformed Churches of France, Germany, Denmark, or Scotland, for which I appeal to all Travellers, &c. I confesse it is a matter of great humiliation to the servants of Christ, that there is occasion to exercise Church discipline and censures in the Reformed Churches: yet this is no other then what was the condition of the Apostolique Churches. 2 Cor. 12. 21. I fear saith the Apostle l…st when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and that I shall bewail many which have sinned already, and have not repented of the uncleannesse, and fornication, and lasciviousnesse which they have committed. And this is not the onelyonly Testimony concerning scandals and disorderly walking in those primitive Churches. But as for those who are so rigid in their censures against the government of the Reformed Churches, I answer to them as Hierome did of the Montanists. They are rigid, Rigidi autem sunt, non qu… & ipsi pejora non peccent: sed hoc inter nos & illos interest, quod illi erubescunt confiteri peccata, quasi justi: nos dum poenitentiam agimus, facilius veniam promer…mur.not to the end that themselves also might not commit worse sins; but this difference there is between them and us, that they are ashamed to confesse their sins, as if they were righteous: We while we repent, do the more easily obtain mercy. Mr. Prynn and others of his profession are not very willing that such an Ecclesiastical discipline be established in England, as is received and setled in Scotland and other Reformed Churches. But if once the like sinsearching, sin-discovering, and sin-censuring discipline were received and duely executed in England, then (and not till then) such comparisons may (if at all they must) be made, between the lives of the generality of the people in England, with those in other Reformed Churches, which of them is more or lesse licentious and scandalous.

A Testimony of Mr. Foxe the Author of the Book of Martyrs, taken out of a treatise of his printed at London, 1551. entituled De Censura Ecclesiastica Interpellatio J. Foxi, the eighth Chapter of which Treatise is here translated out of Latin into English. What the are chief obstacles hindering Excommunication?

THat the thought and care of excommunication hath now so far waxed cold almost in all the Churches, is to be ascribed (as appeareth) unto three sorts of men. The first is of those whose minds the wealth of this world and high advancement of dignity do so lift up, that they are ashamed to submit the neck to the obedience of Christ. What (say these) shall that poor fellow lay a yoke on me? What, should I be subject to this naughty and rude Pastor? But let go, good Sir▪ your vain swelling empty words; how rude soever he be, yet if he be your Pastor, you must needs be a sheep of the flock, whom if he doth rightly instruct, so much the more dutifully you must submit. But if otherwise, it is the fault of the man, not of the Ministry; To those at least yeeld thy self to be ruled, whom thou knowest to be more learned. But go to, thou which canst not suffer a man to be thy Pastor, to whom then wilt thou submit thy self? unto Christ himself (thou sayest:) very well forsooth. This then is of such importance, that Christ for thy cause must again leave the heavens, or by his Angels or Arch-Angels feed and govern thee, whom these mean men the Pastors do not satisfie: But what if it so pleased the Lord by these mean Pastors, as thou callest them, to cast down and conf…und all the highest statelynesse and pride of this World, even as of old by a few and comtemptible Fishers he subdued not onelyonly the high and conceited opinion of Philosophers, but even the Scepters of Kings also? Now what will thy boasting magnificence say? But hear what Christ himself saith of them, whom thou from thy high loftinesse look…st down upon as unworthy. He that despiseth you despiseth me (saith he.) And moreover who so despiseth Christ, despiseth him from whom he is sent, and who said unto him, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee: Ask of me and I will give thee the Heathen for thine inheritance, and the utmost ends of the earth for thy possission: Thou shalt rule them with a rod of yron, and break them in pe…ces like a p…tters vessel. Wherefore seeing thou dost acknowledge so great a Lord, so many wayes above all Maiesty whatsoever can be named; let it not be grievous to thee (my brother whosoever thou art, or with how great power soever thou art highly advanced) laying aside thy high looks and pride, to be humbled under his mighty hand; And do not think it a light matter (whereas thou entertainest with so great applause and honourable respect an earthly Kings Ambassadors) that thou shouldest disdain the Ambassadors of him, who alone hath power over all Kings and Lords. If thou yeeldest unto a mortal Physitian thy wounds to be handled, yea to be cut also, and to be burned and seared (if need be) how commeth it, that thou canst lesse endure the same thing also in the curing of the diseases of the soul from the spiritual Physitian, especially seeing in so many respects better is the health of the soul then of the body? Nor do thou so account any whit in this regard to be impared of thy honour, if unto thy Bishop or Pastor, yea rather herein to Christ thou be subjected. Yea contrariwise, so account as the thing is indeed, that there is no true glory but in Christ and in his sheepfolds; that none do more prosperously reigne, then they which every way do serve him, without whom as there is no glory, so is there no safety and salvation. Neither let it seem disgraceful to thee, what so many ages ago the most high Monarchs of the world and most potent Emperors have done before thee: amongst whom Philip, as he was the first of all the Emperors who was made a Christian; so I meet with no other more famous example, and more worthy of all mens imitation. He willing to be present at the solemn Assemblies of the Church on Easter, and to communicate of the Sacrament▪ when as yet he was judged not worthy of admission; It is reported that Fabian the Bishop withstood him, neither did receive him before he confessed his sins, and stood among the Penitentiaries. What would those our proud gyants, fighters against God do here, if they had stood in the like condition and high place? But this no lesse mild then most mighty Emperor was nothing ashamed (forgetting in the mean while his Imperial Majesty) of his own accord to submit himself to the obedience of his Pastor, undergoing every thing whatsoever in the Name of Christ was imposed upon him. O truly noble Emperor, and no lesse worthy Bishop! But these examples in both are too rare amongst us this day.

Another▪ sort is of those which would be Christians but in name and title onelyonly, they promise an honest enough shew of Christian profession; they dispute both learnedly, and every where with grea… endeavour, of Christ; they carry about in their hands the Gospel; they frequent sacred Sermons; have cast off all superstition; they feed with the perfect; they marry, eat, and are clothed, so as they hold no difference either of times or of places. Finally, Whatsoever is pleasing in Christ they take and stiffely hold. But if ye look into their life, they are Epicures, Wasters, Ravenous, Covetous, Sons of Belial; Not Christs servants, but slaves of their belly; who according to the Satyrist, think vertue to be but words, as the wood to be but trees. And of these there is a great store every where, who seeing onelyonly for their belly they follow Christ, they leave nothing undevised and uninterprised to hinder Excommunication, that so they may the more freely satisfie and serve their own lusts. So the Covetous man feareth that his Covetousnesse be called in question, which he will not forsake. The Adulterer, he that buyeth or selleth men into slavery, the dycer, the whoremonger, the drunkard would rather his intemperance to be concealed. So the Robber, the Murderer, the Incendiary is afraid to be laid open or made known. So he that delighteth to be fatted and enriched with the dammages of the Common▪ wealth, is unwilling to have any bridle to curb and restrain him: The Cheater that with false wares beguileth the people; the seller that with unjust gain outeth counterfeit wares; the deceiver who cozeneth and circumventeth his Neighbour. Last of all whosoever are thus affected that they savour or follow nothing but their belly, their ambition, and the purse, they do not willingly endure that their liberty of sinning should be stopped to them.

Moreover after these, others not much unlike them, come into the same account, which out of some places of Scripture perversely wrested, if they find out ought that may flatter their affections, hence forthwith do they promise a wicked liberty of sinning to themselves and others, whence follows a very great corruption of life, together with injury of the Scripture. While these men are not sufficiently shaken and stricken with the sence of their sin, and force the Scripture violently wrested to defend and maintain their perverse affections, from which Scripture it had been meet to seek all medicines of their vices. But little do these men in the mean while consider how dear it cost Christ, which they make so small account of. They do not mark and weigh how horrible a thing sin is before God, which no otherwise could be expiate and purged but by the death of his onelyonly begotten Son; which hath utterly rui…ated not whole Cities, but Kingdoms also and Monarchies.

Which things if these and all other Epicures did more diligently think of, it would come to passe I suppose, that neither the custome of sin would so much like them, and withall the matter it self would so far draw them, that more willingly they would have recourse unto these so many waies wholsom remedies of the Church, as unto the onelyonly medicine of mans life.

FINIS.

End of the text · George Gillespie, Aarons Rod Blossoming (1646)