Of Justification, Table of contents – Errata
The CONTETS.
Diſputation 1.
Queſt. WHether we are juſtified by believing in Jeſus Chriſt as our King and Teacher, as well as by believing in his blood? Aff. pag. 1.
The ſtate and weight of the Controverſie p. 2, &c.
Ten Propoſitions for fuller explication. p. 10, &c.
Argument firſt. p. 13
Argu. 2. p. 14
Argu. 3. p. 19
Argu. 4. p. 24
Argu. 5. p. 27
Argu. 6. p. 28
Argu. 7. p. 30
Argu. 8. p. 31
Argu. 9. p. 35
Argu. 10. p. 38
defended againſt Mr. Blak's aſſault. p. 40
Whether the Law of Grace condemn any, and how. p. 44, 45
The Diſtinction of ſides quae juſtificat, & quâ juſtificat conſidered. p. 46, &c.
MR. Blak's firſt Argument anſwered. p. 53
Argument 2. anſwered. p. 55
Argument 3. p. 57
Argument 4. p. 63
Argument 5. and 6. p. 64
Diſputation 2.
Queſt. WHether works are a condition of condition of Juſtification, and ſo whether we are juſtified by works as ſuch a condition?
The terms [Works and Juſtification] explained. p. 70, 71
The Term Condition explained. p. 72
The Truth laid down in ſeveral Propoſitions. p. 75
Negative and Affirmative
The main Propoſition proved. p. 79, &c.
Queſt. Can Chriſt be Inſtrumental in juſtifying. p. 84
Queſt. Did Chriſt expiate the ſins, that by the Gospel men are obliged to puniſhment for? p. 86
Of Repentance, and the habit of Faith in Juſtification. p. 85, 86
Queſt. Doth the Goſpel juſtifie us? p. 86, 87, 88, 89
Other points briefly diſcuſſed. p. 90
The Opponents ſtating of the Queſtion. p. 94, 95, 96
Divers unjuſt charges repelled. p. 97, to 101
The Opponents Theſis and Arguments. p. 101, 102
How Abraham was juſtified, debated to p. 110
All works make not the Reward to be not of Grace, proved by ſix Arguments. p. 111, to 115.
And by Expoſitors. p. 115, &c.
His ſecond Argument from the difference put between faith and other Graces in Juſtification. p. 118
The caſe of faiths Intereſt opened by a ſimilitude. p. 120
His third Argument conſidered: Our firſt Juſtification how different from the following. p. 122, 123
His fourth Argument of ſelf Righteouſneſs and cauſal conditions. p. 124, &c.
His Fifth Argument, Works are the fruits, therefore not the condition. p. 128
His ſixth Argument. p. 132
His ſeventh Argument. Of a twofold Righteouſneſs or Juſtification. p. 133
His eight Argument that cannot be a condition of Juſtification, which it ſelf needeth Juſtification. p. 136
Anſwered.
Paul judgeth them dung. p. 140
How juſtifying faith belongs to the Law, and the difference between the Law and Goſpel. p. 142
More of Chriſts ſuffering for the violation of the new Covenant. p. 146
His ninth Argument, we fill men with doubts. p. 147
Anſwered.
His tenth Argument. p. 149
Of the reconciling of Paul and James. p. 150. &c.
Letters that paſt between this Reverend Brother and me. p. 157
In which is diſcuſſed the Argument from Abrahams Juſtification. And in the laſt Letter theſe queſtions.
1. Whether videre, audire, be only Grammatical actions, and Phyſical Paſſions. p. 194, &c.
2. Whether Believing be only ſo, and credere only pati. p. 198
3. Whether Faith be paſſive in its Inſtrumentality. p. 207
4. Whether the Opponents way make not other Graces as proper Inſtruments of Juſtification. p. 211
5. Whether Faith be a proper Inſtrument of Juſtification. p. 212
6. Queſtion. If Faith be an Inſtrument, whether it juſtifie primarily and proxime as ſuch, or as an apprehenſion of Chriſt or Righteouſneſs. p. 214
7. Queſtion, which is the more clear, ſafe and certain Doctrine. p. 220
Repentance, whether excluded. p. 227
Of Faith relatively taken. p. 228
Of the Aſſemblies Definition of faith. p. 230
The Judgement of ſome Divines. p. 233, &c.
whether a dying man may look on his own Acts as the Conditions of the Covenant performed. p. 241, &c.
Further Explications. p. 244. &c.
Diſputation 3.
Queſt. WHether Beſides the Righteouſneſs of Chriſt imputed, there be a perſonal evangelical Righteouſneſs neceſſary to Juſtification and Salvation? Affir. p. 259
Diſtinctions and Propoſitions Negative and Affirmative for explication. p. 260, &c.
Proved. p. 266
Objections anſwered. p. 269, &c.
Mr. Warner's Arguments confuted. p. 273 to 285
Mr. Warner's 13th chap. confuted about Juſtiſtcation, and the Intereſt of Obedience, &c p. 286
Maſter Warner's Arguments anſwered, by which he would exclude Chriſt as King, &c. from being the Object of juſtifying faith. p. 293. &c.
The other chief paſſages in his Book conſidered. p. 305, &c.
His diſtinction of fides quae & qua. p. 308, &c.
His Preface anſwered in an Epiſtle. p. 313
MR. John Tombe's, his friendly Animadverſions on my Aphoriſms, with a Diſcuſſion of them. p. 322
Juſtification in Law-title by the Promiſe fully vindicated. p. 332, &c.
Whether Juſtification be a continued Act, or but one Act. p. 341 &c.
Whether Faith comprize Love, Subjection or other Graces: at large. p. 345, &c.
Whether Faith be only in the Intellect, or alſo in the Will. p. 354, &c.
Juſtifying Faith receiveth Chriſt as Lord, &c. p. 358
It is Faith, and not only Love, or other Graces, by which the Will receiveth Chriſt. p. 361. &c.
The Goſpel is a Law. p. 369, &c.
Repentance neceſſary to Juſtification. p. 370, &c.
How Faith juſtifieth. p. 377
Whether Chriſt had a Title on Earth to Rule. p. 379
Of Chriſts univerſal Dominion and Redemption. p. 380
More of the Juſtification by the Goſpel-Promiſe. p.384
Of Preparatives to Juſtification. p. 387
What Paul excludeth as oppoſite to faith in Juſtification. p. 391, 392
Of Interciſion, of Juſtification, and the guilt of particular ſins. p. 393, &c.
Diſputation 4.
Queſt. WHether the Faith which Paul oppoſeth to works in Juſtification, be one only Phyſical Act of the Soul? Or, Whether all Humane Acts, except one Phyſical Act of Faith, be the works which Paul excludeth from Juſtification? Neg. p. 399
The Queſtion opened: and its proved that this Faith is not one only, Act. 1. Either Numerically. 2. Or of an inferior Genus, ſo as to be of one only Faculty: Nor only God the Father, Chriſt, Promiſe, Pardon, Heaven, &c. the Object. 3. Nor in ſpecie ſpecieliſſima, proved by many Arguments.
ERRATA.
PAge 6. line 23. read that 1. p. 13. l. 10. r. quae Chriſtum. p. 14. l. 9. r. promitentis. I. 22. r. hath. p. 18. l. 3. r. as this. l. 34. r. proof of. p. 19. …. 24. r. be the. l. 34. r. …. p. 21. l. 17. r. that be is. p. 24. l. 35. r. thus. p. 29. l. 13. r. though. p. 32. l. 32 r. muſt be p. 39. l. 6. r. with p. 44. l. 1. r. I need. p. 45. l. 30. r. Commination. P. …2. l. 11. r. as. p. 55. l 26. r. noſtri. l. 32. r. excluſion. p. 64. l. 30. r. Curſe. p. 74. l. 8. r. capitibus. p. 81. l. 13. r. no. l. 20. r. All. p. 85. l. 6. blot out againſt. p. 87. l. 22. r. that is. l. 21. r. execution. p. 88. l. 12. read there. p. 94. l. 10. r. notion. p. 95. l. 3. r. u. l. 9. r. your. p. 99. l. 19 r. as mediate it. p. 119. l. 36. r. as. p. 135. …. 5. r. that he hath not. p. 136. l. 18. r. Chriſt. p. 139. l. 13. r. a means. page 152. l. 17. r. been. p. 166. l. 38. r. we may. p. 168. r. Gods. p. 170 l. 17. r ſigns. p. 175. l. 15. r. divers. p. 178. l. 19. r. be that works not. p. 180. l. 4. r. or. p. 183. l. 19. r. caſuals. p. 186. l. 25. r. ſenſu. p. 197. l. 29. r. Potentia. p. 208. l. 8. r. Porret. l. 31. r. Paſſive in. p. 210 l 24. r. mediante. p. 212. l. 12. r. except. p. 233. l. 7. r. in the. p. 243. l. 32. blot out till. p. 252. l. 13. r. veritatus. p. 257. l. 14. r. exalted. p. 271. l. 10. r. righteous. p. 286. l. 17. r. be. l. 24. r. the. p. 290. l. 1. r. marks. p. 294. l. 22. and l. 26. and p. 265. l. 23. and 26. for. quae r. qud. p. 299. l. 1. r. unproved p. 314. l. 36. r. cull. p. 319. …. 14. r. that is. p. 320. l. 14 r. fur. p. 326 l. 31. r. fruit. p. 354. l. ult. r. praemotione. p 360. l. 27. r. God. p. 361. l. 32. r. though…. p, 386. l. 27. r. Is it not. p. 387. l. 32. r. ſanctification. p. 390. l. 22. r. morally. p. 398. l. 15. r. probable. l. 23 r. Impenitency.