Defense of the True Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, Table – Colophon
A TABLE OF THE CHIEF AND PRINCIPALL MATTERS CONteyned in this Booke.
The contentes of the first booke.
THe abuse of the Lordes supper.
Fol. 1.
The eatyng of the body of Christ.
Eodem
The eatyng of the sacrament of his body
fol. 2.
Christ calleth the material bread his body
fol. 4.
Euil men do eat ye sacramēt, but not the body of Christ.
fo. 5.
Thynges sufficente for a christen mans faythe, concernyng this sacrament
Eodem
The sacrament which was ordeined to make louelove & concord is tourned into the occasion of variance and discord
fo. 6.
The spirituall hunger and thirstynesse of the soule.
fol. eod.
The spirituall foode of the soule
fol. 8.
Christ farre excelleth all corporal foode
fol. 9.
The sacramētes were ordayned to confirme our fayth.
eodē,
Wherfore this sacramēt was ordayned in bread and wyne.
fol. 11.
The vnitee of Christes mistical body
Eodem
This sacrament moueth all men to louelove & frendship.
fol. 12.
The doctrine of transubstantiation doth cleane subuert our fayth in Christ.
Eodem.
The spiritual eatyng is with the heart, not with the teethe.
fol. 13.
Foure principal errors of the Papistes
fol. 14.
The first is of transubstantiation.
fol. eod.
The second is of the presence of Christ in this sacrament.
fol. 15.
The third is that euil menne eate and drynke the very body. and bloud of Christ
fol. 17.
The fourth is of the dayly sacrifice of Christ
fol. eod.
The contentes of the second booke.
The confutation of the error of Trāsubstantiation.
fol. 17.
The Papistical doctrine is contrary to Gods worde.
Eodē
The Papistical doctrine is against reason.
fol. 20.
The Papistical doctrine is also against our senses.
fol. 21.
The Papistical doctrine is contraye to the fayth of the olde authors of Christes Churche
fol. 23.
Transubstantiation came from Rome
fol. 29.
The first reason of the Papistes to proue their Transubstantiation, with the answere therto
fol. 31.
The seconde argumente for Transubstantiation, with the aunswere.
fol. 33.
The third… argument, with the answere,
fol. 34.
Authours wrested of the Papystes for theyr transubstantiation.
fol. 34.
Negatives by comparison
fol. 36.
Absurditees that folowe of transubstantiation.
fol. 43.
The contentes of the thirde booke.
¶The presence of Christe in the sacrament
fol. 45.
Christe corporally is ascended into heauen
fol. …od.
The difference betwene the trewe and the Papisticall doctrine concernyng the presence of Christes body
fol. 46.
The profe wherof by our professiō in our cōmon crede.
fo. 48
An other profe by the holy scripture
fo. 49
Also an other profe by auncient authours,
fol. eodem.
One body can not be in dyuers places at one tyme
fol. 52.
An answere to the Papistes, alledgyng for them these wordes, This is my body
fol. 56.
The argumente of the Papystes
fol. eod.
The interpretation of these wordes, This is my body.
fol. eod.
Christ called bread his body, & wine his bloud
fo. 57.
Bread is my body, wyne is my bloudde, bee figuratiue speeches
fol. 59.
To eate Christes fleshe and drynke his bloud, be figuratiue speeches
fol…. eod.
This is my body: This is my bloudde, bee figuratiue speeches
fol. 62.
The breade representeth Christes bodye, and the wyne his bloude
fol. eod.
Signes and fygures hauehave the names of the thynges, whyche they sygnifie
fo. 64.
Fiue principall thinges to be noted in Theodoretus.
fo. 70.
Figuratiue speeches bee not straunge,
fo. 71.
Christe hym selfe vsed figuratiue speeches,
fol. eodem
The Paschall Lambe,
folio. 72.
The Lordes Supper,
folio eodem.
What figuratiue speeches were vsed at Christes laste supper,
folio 73.
Aunswere to the auctoritees and argumentes of the Papystes,
folio 74.
One brefe aunswere to all,
fol. eod.
The aunsweres to all the doctours,
folio, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87.
The contentes of the fourth boke.
Whether euill men do eate and drynke Christe
fol. 90.
The godly onelyonly eate Christ
Eodem,
What is the eatyng of Christes fleshe, and drinkyng of his bloud.
fol. 91.
Christ is not eaten with teethe, but with fayth
Eodem.
The good only eate Christe
fol. 92.
The aunswere to the Papystes, that doo affyrme that the euyll doo eate Christes body &c.
fo. 97.
The aunswere to the Papystes authors, whyche at the fyrste shewe, seeme to make for theym
foli. 98.
Figures be called by the names of the thynges whiche they sygnifie.
fol. 99.
The adoration of the sacrament
folio. 101.
The simple people be deceyued
Eodem.
They be the Papistes that hauehave deceiued the people
fol. 103.
An exhortation to the true honoryng of Christ in the sacrament.
foli. 104.
The contentes of the fift booke.
¶ The sacrifice of the masse
fol. 104.
The difference betweene the sacrifice of Christe, and of the priestes of the olde lawe
folio eodem
Two kyndes of sacrifices
fol. 106.
The sacrifice of Christe,
folio eodem.
A more playne declaration of the sacrifice of Christ.
fo. eod.
The sacrifices of the olde lawe
fol. 107.
The masse is not a sacrifice propiciatorye,
fol. 108.
A confutation of the papistes cauillation,
fol. 109
The true sacrifice of all christen people.
Eodem
The Popishe Masse is detestable Idolatry, vtterly to be banished from all christen congregations.
fol. 110.
EueryEvery manne ought to receiue the sacrament himselfe, and not one for another.
fol. 111.
The difference betwene the priest & the lay man.
Eodem
The answere to the Papistes, concernyng the sacrifice propiciatorie
fol. 112.
An aunswere to the authors
fol. eodem
The lay persons make a sacrifice aswel as the priest.
fol. 114
The Papistical Masse is neither a sacrifice propitiatorye, nor of thankes geuyng.
Eodem
There was no Papistical Masses in the primatiue churche
Eodem
The causes and meanes howe Papisticall Masses entered into the Churche
fol. 115
The abuses of the Papisticall Masses
fo. eod.
What Churche is to bee folowed
fo. 116.
A shorte instruction to the holy communyon
fol. eod.
Here endeth the Table
IMPRINTED at London in Poules churcheyarde, at the signe of the Brasen serpent, by Reynold Wolfe.
Cum priuilegio ad imprimendum solum.
ANNO DOMINI. M.D.L.
End of the text · Archishop Thomas Cranmer, Defense of the True Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper (1550)